QI
For the episode you watched, state the series (this will be a letter),
channel, day and time of broadcast:
The episode of QI that I have
watched is the BBC Christmas Special episode nine series N, broadcasted on the
22nd of December 2016 at 10:00pm.
State the
genre of the programme:
The Genre is comedy.
State the names of the host and panellists:
The host of
this QI is, Sandi
Toksvig. The panellists include: Josh Widdicombe, Susan Calman, Matt Lucas and
Alan Davies.
As
the host, how does Sandi Toksvig relate to the other panellists?
Sandi
Toksvig and the panellists are all on the show with the same intentions- to
entertain the audience. They all want to succeed in being humorous resulting in
making the audience laugh. Sandi Toksvig, Josh Widdicombe, Susan Calman,
Matt Lucas and Alan Davies all have experience of being on a comedy chat show
before so therefore know what type of jokes and phrases make an audience laugh,
making Sandi Toksvig relate to them.
What is 'quite interesting' about the extract that you watched?
‘Quite
interesting’ facts are very important and are used a lot throughout this chat
show. They are facts you are told for entertainment reasons rather than knowing
and getting the answer correct. BBC believe that the most “boring” facts can be
made interesting if you go about it the right way.
An example
of a ‘quite interesting’ fact is one about reindeer. Sandi Toksvig told us that
reindeer have a layer of tissue behind their retina that reflects light so they
therefore do not need a red nose to “guide father Christmas’s slay” in the
night.
What makes you laugh in the episode?
Throughout
this episode, the thing that amused me the most was the childish, English
Christmas game called, “Are you there Moriaty”. I found it funny watching grown
men and women hitting each other, blind folded with a rolled up newspaper. The
most humorous part of this game was when Alan Davies and Josh Widdicombe are
playing. Alan takes off his blindfold and Josh is completely oblivious to this.
This results in Alan being able to hit Josh on the head every time and avoid
getting hit by confused Josh.
How is Sandi Toksvig's erudition (the extent of her knowledge) shown?
The extent
of her knowledge is shown by her ability to explain the answer to every
question with no trouble and minimizing the amount of times she looks down at
her cards. She also cleverly shows the extent of her knowledge by asking
questions you would think you know the answer to. Instead, you are proved wrong
by Sandi making her look very clever. An example of this is when the “mash up”
of “All I want for Christmas” was played. Sandi asked the panellists and the
audience if they could hear people singing. Some hands were raised in the
audience but Josh, Alan and Matt all thought that was ridiculous as they couldn’t
hear any voices. They were then explained the reasoning behind it by Sandi and
were blown away but now understood.
Are the audience passive consumers or active participants?
Although
there is one interactions between the panellists and the audience, for the rest
of the show, they just sit and watch and the only clue that they are there is
from the sound of their laughs. Therefore, I believe they are passive
consumers.
What is the role of Alan Davies and how does he contribute to audience pleasures?
Alan Davies
is very funny and clearly knows how to please the audience. He was given
humorous attention and stood out from the start by making the sound of his
buzzer funny and different to the others. He is also a middle-ages
common-looking man- like a lot of the audience making him a panellist some may
relate to. Alan makes a number of childish jokes for example, one about a bird
farting as he is taking off. This type of humour appeals to children resulting
him in giving all ranges of audience pleasures.
How far does the programme fulfil its Public Service Broadcasting remit
to inform, to educate and to entertain?
In my
opinion, this episode of QI successfully informs, educates and entertains. This
is because the viewers are informed on a lot of facts continuously throughout
the whole episode but there is never a dull, boring moment. We are always
engaged and listening to the facts as we find it funny and all questions and
answers usually end in a comedic discussion. Because I was never bored watching
this episode, most of the facts have stayed in my head. All facts were made
interesting and they were all informative.
How is the audience positioned: as omniscient or powerless?
Because of
Sandi Toksvig being so knowledgeable, it makes both audiences, (the live
audience and the audience watching at home) feel powerless because they feel
they don’t have much knowledge compared to her. However, this is equalled out
when the panellists almost always get the answers wrong making the audience
feel equal or even omniscient compared to them.